Commentary: The Nike Bias
June 15, 2007 — Joe EnglishIt’s time for some participation for you readers out there. Post your comments on this page folks. I want to hear from you on this topic. Do you hear this in your part of the country? What do you think?
So as most of you know, I live in Portland, Oregon. Portland happens to be the home-town of Nike - Beaverton is anyway, which is a suburb of Portland. I know lots of people that work at Nike and I use a lot of their gear. In fact, I wear. . . their shoes.
I’m not paid to wear their shoes. I wear them, because they make some excellent running shoes.
Yet, when I talk to runners all over the country, I hear people say things like this: “I can’t run in Nikes, they don’t have enough support.” Or even better, I had an athlete tell me that her doctor said to her (and I quote): “Next time I see you, I don’t want you to be wearing Nikes.”
This is really interesting to me.
But first, I can tell you where this strange stereotype comes from. It started back in the 80s when a lot of Nike “fitness” shoes ended up on the feet of runners. A more general fitness shoe - that looks like a running shoe - doesn’t provide the support that a running shoe does. Nike got a bad rap.
I even fell into this camp. I was running in high school in the 80s and wore some of the lightest Nike running shoes possible. It was straight to Shin-Splints-ville for me. So I switched to Asics and ran in them for years. But at some point, Asics discontinued the shoe that I loved and I had to move to a new brand of shoes. I stumbled on the Nike Zoom Air Elite and loved it. I ran in them for several seasons - and this was BEFORE I moved here to Portland.
So why do these ideas that Nike can’t make a good running shoe persist?
What we’re really dealing with is a stereotype. I looked up the term in the dictionary and here’s what it says: “a standardized mental picture that is held in common by members of a group and that represents and oversimplified opinion, prejudiced attitude or uncritical judgment.” (Source: Merriam Webster’s On-line Dictionary)
That sounds a lot like what we’re dealing with here. People that have never put on a Nike shoe will come right out and tell me: “Nikes don’t have enough support.” I often ask them, “have you ever run in Nikes?” They usually come back with either a ‘no’ (they’d been warned away by some older, more seasoned runner) or a “once back in high school”. So is that an “over-simplified opinion”? It’s probably at least an opinion based on very limited knowledge.
What’s even more interesting to me is that Nike basically invented the modern running shoe. You know Prefontaine, Bill Bowerman, University of Oregon. The story about making shoe soles on waffle irons. Yes, this is the company that figured out how to make a rubber-soled running shoe.
My intention here is not to sway anyone into wearing Nike shoes. Everyone makes a personal choice and no brand of shoes will work for all runners. In fact, you need to put on your feet whatever works for you. Which is why it is so interesting that people might discount out of hand a vast brand of shoes that might work for them.
I should add that I run in multiple brands of shoes depending on the type of run and terrain. My shoe box runneth over, quite seriously. I run on Nike, New Balance, Montrail, and Innov8 to name a few. You have to go with what works for you in the situation.
My interests here are to understand why this persists among runners. Is it a conspiracy by other running shoe companies? Are we just willing to pass on a stereotype so easily? These are interesting questions.
I invite you to weigh in on this. Will I get a bunch of comments that say that I’m a Nike hack and that they love brand X or hate Nike. Absolutely. But just keep in mind that I’m not a Nike hack and I understand you love your shoes. I’m just interested in understanding what’s going on in the minds of runners out there.
The floor is yours if you want it.
Have a good weekend runners!
Coach Joe
Running Wild with Coach Joe – a blog focused on marathon racing, training and motivation. Bookmark us at http://coachjoeenglish.wordpress.com or use your favorite RSS feed reader to get the latest news and articles. Running Wild is also available on Yahoo! 360 and MySpace.
June 15, 2007 at 8:38 am
I love my Brooks Adrenaline sneakers.
I haven’t tried on Nike running shoes because my favorite (small, family-owned) running store here in Brooklyn apparently cannot carry their products, since they don’t sell enough stock. I’ve heard that Nike requires a minimum annual purchase from retail stores and that lets the small ones out.
Also, having worn the “Shox,” I’m not inclined to take Nike seriously as a maker of “real” running sneakers.
June 15, 2007 at 8:55 am
I personally idolized Nike shoes when the original Air Max was launched. I personally refused to run in a shoe that a) wasn’t made by Nike and b) did not have “Air” somewhere in the name. Nike Air shoes where the definition of cool and performance.
I had a falling-out with Nike in the late 80’s when my pair of Air Stability trainers left me with a stress fracture due to a blown air pocket. I saved all summer long to shell out $110 for a pair of shoes that failed miserably. After rehabbing the injury, I switched over to ASICS with and found their shoes to be more comfortable and better constructed.
While I have run in Nikes since, I have never been overly impressed with their shoes relative to other offerings on the market. I am of the opinion that Nike lost focus on quality in the 80’s and 90’s and were too focused on “flash” and not enough on “substance”. I believe this is when Nike alienated a large sub-set of the running community and is currently paying the price with their reputation.
Nike may have returned to making good running shoes, but IMO there are better shoes out there for the same or less money.
June 15, 2007 at 8:56 am
This is an interesting comment. I’m not sure how channel strategy by a company impacts the way (for example) sales people might talk about shoes in their stores. But it is interesting to consider.
I do know that most major shoe companies, surely including Nike, limit certain product lines to big box retailers. But those are shoes you probably don’t want anyway.
While I’m not arguing the merits of any particular shoe here, I will say that Nike’s “Bowerman” line is an excellent line-up of shoes for serious runners. These are usually the ones that will be sold in small stores like the one that you mention, because they are meant for the “core” running market.
I had a chance to try a pair of Shox recently- the Shox Junga Trail shoe. It wasn’t a great shoe. Not bad, but not great. I pronated a lot in it. But I’ll try just about any shoe to be able to talk about it with you runners out there.
Coach Joe
June 15, 2007 at 10:26 am
Well, being a relatively new runner, I based my running shoes on the “professionals” at the store. And if they check my gate (if that’s what it’s called) and they bring me Brooks Adrenaline or Asics I’m going to trust their recommendations. If they would have brought out a pair of Nike’s, I would have bought those. I wonder how much is driven by retail stores for all of us newbies. And since good shoes can be quite expensive, though worth it, I’m not going to run out and buy another brand new pair just because they don’t feel like I’m running on air. That’s my take on it. BTW I’m am on my way right now to buy Nike’s Air Zoom Vomero+2.
June 15, 2007 at 2:33 pm
I have no personal bias for or against Nike, my reason for not wearing their shoes is availability of wider sizes. I know they offer wider widths in some of their models, but thus far I have found them only in Nike specific stores, not in the running stores I frequent. I base my shoe purchase strongly on the recommendations of the staff at the running stores, when they recommend a Nike that fits well, I will try it. Until then, Brooks and New Balance.
June 15, 2007 at 8:21 pm
As a new runner I trusted the people at the running store. What ever they told me I would have bought. They actually recommended a Nike Bowerman series shoe and it has worked out great. Honestly though, when I went to try on shoes I was wearing a pair of Nike’s( just for everyday life not running) and I was kind of embarassed. I was thinking “real runners” didn’t wear Nike’s. I do love my Nikes though.
June 18, 2007 at 11:25 am
Coach Joe,
Your question is humorous for me. Did you hear me the other day at track practice?! I was saying that I do not like to wear Nike shoes because they are not ‘true’ running shoes.
From my perspective, Nike is known for all kinds of sports, and running is only one of them. I like the idea of buying from a company that caters more to running. Plus loads of people - who are not athletes - wear Nike shoes. When I wear Nike shoes, it does not say “Hey world, I am a dedicated runner”. Yeah, that doesn’t really matter, but it goes through my mind.
Anyway, there is lots of ‘hype’ around the brand in the general market ~ so that may limit how seriously an athlete takes the product.
With all that said, I always buy my shoes from running stores. After purposefully trying all the other brands, I have always worn Nike because they are most comfortable.
Interesting thread…
August 15, 2007 at 7:51 pm
For a beginner such as myself with no foot/ankle problems or anomalies, my Nike Shox Turbo + Vs have been working out well. Once I become more in tune with how running truly impacts my feet, I might feel differently. And I have definitely been told by seasoned runners that the Shox are no good on their achilles. But for now, I love the way they look, and their sheer presence actually motivates me to run more (must be the hot pink shox :)).
I agree with Heather, this is a really interesting thread, considering the fact that I’ve only been running for about 6 months and have noticed the stigma that sometimes goes along with purchasing Nike running shoes.
August 16, 2007 at 3:20 pm
Ma Petite Princesse,
I will have to look into this issue of the Nike Shox and their lack of support of the Achilles.
I have a pair of the Shox Junga trail shoes and they are OK. They aren’t a great shoe, but an OK shoe.
The heel is, by design, highly fluid. The shocks in the rear really move when the heel comes down on it. But I’m not sure why this might cause problems with the Achilles. I’ll ask Nike and find out what they have to say about it.
When it’s time to move on to new shoes, just go on down to the local running store and have yourself fitted for a shoe built for the “core runner”. These are the ones that will satisfy your friends concerns - and they should be good for you too!
Coach Joe
November 2, 2007 at 5:03 pm
I think Nike’s are going to the retro look now for the more casual crowd. Their athletic line is ugly, but I like the retro looking ones.